Interested parties should contact Joseph McMullin. Two highlights of their work are presented below:
CO Spectrum (Nov 1996) shows the integrated line area of the CO(3-2) and CO(4-3) lines for several days in November 1996. The error bars are dominated by the uncertainty in locating the spectral baseline. The error bars do not account for a ~10% uncertainty in estimating the telescope efficiency. This error source would apply a constant multiplicative factor to the CO (4-3) data. Thus, the relative values of the (3-2) line areas are unaffected by this error, but the (3-2)/(4-3) ratio could change.
The CO Production Rate (T=40K) is derived from the observations. The coma is assumed to be isothermal, in equilibrium at 40 K and the gas is assumed to have a constant, radial velocity of 0.5 km/s. The jump in production rates between November 10 and 11 is smaller if the assumed coma temperature is actually higher (see T=60K ), but the trend still suggests a strong increase in activity over this time period. The comet's heliocentric distance decreased by 2% between November 6 and 10, while CO production increased by 60%.
The T=60K CO Production Rate is identical to the previous calculation, except now the coma temperature is taken to be 60 K. While the data strongly suggest an increase over time, note that the error bars allow for a roughly constant CO production rate near 1.2E29 molecules/s, particularly if the gas excitational temperature is high. [For the CO(3-2) observation of November 10th and the CO (4-3) data of the 11th to yield the same production rate (~3.2E29 molecules/s) the excitation temperature would have to be ~140K.]
Simultaneous observations of the H2CO line at 351.768 GHz, which appears near a velocity of zero, and the HCN (4-3) line at 354.5 GHz. Note the shape of the lines are "flipped" due their being in different sidebands. The lower curve (red) is for observations near 3:30 LST on March 29, 1997, while the upper curve (blue) is for 4:15 LST of the same day. The apparent time variability may be due to pointing errors.
Next, we display the short-term time variability of the integrated line areas for the H2CO and HCN lines. The error bars include an allowance for antenna pointing being off by the beam half width (10"). This term dominates the error budget.
The HCN/H2CO ratio is calculated based on the data from the short-term time variability. As before, possible pointing errors dominate the error budget.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |